International
Journal of Herbs and Pharmacological Research IJHPR,
2013, 2(4): 42 – 47.
RESEARCH
PAPER:
ANTIBACTERIAL
ACTIVITIES OF DIFFERENT SOLVENT EXTRACTS OF CARICA
PAPAYA
FRUIT PARTS ON SOME GRAM POSITIVE AND GRAM NEGATIVE ORGANISMS
1Orhue P.O. and *2Momoh A.R.M.
Department
of 1Microbiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences; 2Medical
Microbiology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences;
Ambrose
Alli University, Ekpoma-Nigeria.
Correspondence:
mcsionelphilrazzy@yahoo.com
Received: 29th july, 2013
Accepted: 19th October, 2013 Published: 31st October, 2013
ABSTRACT
Aside
its nutritional values, there are speculations that Carica papaya, also
known as paw paw, has antibacterial potentials. This study evaluates the
antibacterial potentials of different extracts of C.papaya parts, in
comparison with standard drugs (perflacine and cefuroxine). Dried and grinded
papaya leaves (5g), fruit peels (5g); and seeds (5g), respectively mixed with
95ml of extraction solvent (water, ethanol, 1% HCl, acetone and petroleum
ether) for 24 hours, were used for this study. The constituent compounds were
filtered aseptically and inoculated unto MacConkey and Nutrient agars to verify
the sterility of the solutions for utilization. Results showed high antimicrobial
activity for the extracts of C.papaya in petroleum ether with a Minimun
Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of 2mg/ml as against 4mg/ml and 6mg/ml for
perflacine and cefuroxine respectively. Extracts in 1% HCl and ethanol however,
showed antimicrobial activity against the gram positive and negative organisms
investigated, while extracts in water was only active against Escherichia
coli and S. aureus. No statistical difference (P<0.05) was observed
in the antimicrobial activities between the extracts of petroleum ether and the
standard antimicrobial drugs. These suggest that C. papaya may be used
as an antibiotic, and extracts in petroleum ether seems more potent.
Key
words: Carica papaya, Antimicrobial, Extraction solvents, Plant parts.
_____________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
The
use of local plants as primary health remedies, due to their pharmacological
properties, is quite common in Asia, Latin America, USA, China, Japan and
Africa (Bibitha et al., 2002). According to Boakye-yiadon and Dwuma-Bada
(1997), there are over 10,000 medicinal plants in West Africa, used for disease
treatment and prevention. While infectious diseases are reported to be the
world’s major human threat and accounting for almost 50,000 deaths every day
(Ahmad and Beg, 2001), the frequency and diversity of life-threatening
infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms has increased steadily; becoming
an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immune-compromised patients
especially in developing countries (Al-Bari et al., 2006). The situation is
further complicated with the rapid development of multidrug resistance to the
available antimicrobial drugs (Nirosha and Mangalanayaki, 2013). This has globally
challenged research institutions, pharmaceutical companies and the academia,
and has led to the search for newer sources of antibiotics that must be more
effective, affordable and readily available (Adekunle and Adekunle, 2009; Latha
and Kannabiran, 2006).
Plants
have been reported to be the cheapest and most effective source of drugs
(Mathur et al., 2011; Prince and Prabakaran, 2011; Pretorius and Watt, 2001).
In recent times, the use of herbal medicine in third world countries has increased,
owing to the fact western orthodox medicines are relatively expensive and
readily not available. This explains the increasing research on various plants,
and the upsurge in mass-media advert placement on herbal preparations by countless
‘traditional doctors’.
Of interest in
this study, is Carica papaya (C. papaya) commonly known as pawpaw
(English), Adiba (Ewe–Ghana) or Bofre (Twi–Ghana). It belongs to the family of Caricaceae
and several species of Caricaceae have been used as medication
against a variety of diseases (Mello et al., 2008). Available evidence
indicate that C. papaya can act as an analgesic, amebicide,
antibacterial, cardiotonic, cholagogue, digestive, emenagogue, febrifuge,
hypotensive, laxative, pectoral, stomachic and vermifuge (Anibijuwon and Udeze,
2009). Many scientific investigations have also been conducted to evaluate the
biological activities of their various parts including fruits, shoots, leaves,
rinds, seeds, roots or latex (Baskaran et al., 2012; Maisarah et al., 2013). In
fact, a number of studies worldwide have investigated the antimicrobial
properties of plants and C. papaya has been reported to serve as a
source for therapeutic alternatives (Adriana et al., 2007).
Studies conducted
in different parts of Africa have demonstrated the significant antibacterial
activity of various extracts pawpaw tree parts (Doughari et al., 2007; Dawkins
et al., 2003; Emeriwa, 1982). Specifically, Osato et al., (1993) reported that
the latex of C. papaya is bacteriostatic to Bacillus spp, Enterobacter
coacae, Escherichia coli, Saimonella typhi, Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus
vulgaris. The seed was reported to have antimicrobial activity against Trichomonas
vaginalis trophozoites and was suggested it could be used in urinogenital
disorder like trichomoniasis, however, with care to avoid toxicity (Calzada et
al., 2007). In addition to its antimicrobial qualities, scientists have
discovered that C. papaya can mitigate many side effects associated with
synthetic antimicrobial agents (Rajeshwar and Gupta, 2005; Iwu et al., 1999).
Despite these
scientific facts on the antimicrobial potentials of C. papaya, little
information exits on studies that have compared the potencies of extracts from
different parts in varied extraction solvents. Hence, this study investigates
the antibacterial activity of different parts of Carica papaya in
different extraction solutions, in comparison with standard drugs (perflacine
and cefuroxine).
ASN-PH-020919
ISSN:
2315-537X
No comments:
Post a Comment